Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Analysis Of Contribution Of Determinist Theories †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Analysis Of Contribution Of Determinist Theories. Answer: The assignment is based on the proper analysis of contribution of determinist theories and strategic choices. The organization theorists have properly developed different perspectives that are theoretical in nature as to provide compelling view of the change in the organization. The different theories such as resource dependency theory, population theory as well as population ecology helps in generating proper understanding on the organizational action. The main aim and purpose of the assignment is to identify the perspective that is most compelling in nature. The reasoning has to be properly analyzed as this will help in comparing the different population as well as determinist theories along with the organizational performance. The structure of the essay will be discussing the different theories and approaches with proper comparison with the organizational performance of the employees. The response has to be properly provided with the dependency theory as well as population theory. The different theories related to the determinism theory have been described as this will help in analyzing the differences in the determinism as well as strategic choice theory. This will help in understanding the compelling perception. Strategic choice helps in involving an entire process with the help of decision that is considered in order to choose a particular option from different alternatives. The original procedure helps the managers and the decision makers to keep both external and internal environment before thinning it to one (Lam et al., 2013). For instance- When an organization has quandary as whether to invest in a new inorganic process of growth, there are different options available for the overtaking reason. Furthermore, it is the duty to check the merits as well as demerits of the companies that has been overtaken. Furthermore, after checking the external and internal environment, this will help in narrowing down the choice to a single organization. On the other hand, determinism is the philosophical approach that is inevitable as well as necessary in nature for the different affairs that takes place in the organization. Determinism is the approach that is relevant only for the external environment of the organization and it helps the organization in taking important decisions based on the external environment (Xu and Meyer, 2013). For instance- Proper availability of raw materials will affect the productivity of the entire organization as the entire availability of resources is dependent on the supply and demand for those particular resources in a particular organization (Maudlin, 2014). There are different kinds of theories under determinism approach that are described as follows: Resource Dependency Theory is the study of the effect of the external environment on the behavior of the organization (Foss and Knudsen, 2013). Proper procurement of the different external resources is essential tenet for both tactical as well asstrategic management of the company. The success of the entire organization is dependent on the resource dependency theory and this helps the organization in maximizing the power (Moulin, 2014). There are different assumptions of resource dependency theory that are described as follows: The different companies need to comprise of both internal as well as external environment coalitions that emerge from exchanges that are social in nature and these are created for controlling as well as influencing the behavior. The work environment is required to carry scared as well as valuable resources that are essential for the survival of the entire organization (Hill, Jones and Schilling, 2014). The environment can face the problem of uncertainty in acquisition of the resources. The companies are assumed to work properly on two objectives wherein proper control has to be acquired as to minimize the dependence of the other companies. Proper control over the different resources is essential as this will help in maximizing the dependence on the entire organization (Vanwonterghem et al., 2014). Institutional theories help in asserting proper institutional kind of environment in the organization that can strongly help in influencing the formal structure development. The different strategies that are innovative in nature help in improving the efficiency technically in making the organizations easily adopt in legitimizing the environment (Felin, Foss and Ployhart, 2015). The institutional isomorphism gets increased when the companies are that these are highly dependent on different environment of the organization that is institutional and that exists under uncertainty or the goals that are ambiguous in nature and properly rely on the professionals (Franklin, 2017). Population Ecology is the sub category of ecology that helps in dealing with dynamics of the population of the species that helps in interacting with the entire environment (Epstein, 2014). This is quite popular in the determining the external environment of the organization as this will help in understanding the demand of the population. The most popular theory of the population is Malthusian theory (Berofsky, 2015). The theory is simple in nature as when the need of food increase in human beings, the individual himself will increase the demand for the food (Anastasiou and Kauffman, 2013). This will result in increase in supply of the food as well. The population will increase when the subsistence means will increase as well (Clegg, Kornberger and Pitsis, 2015). The theory will be propounded by Malthus has to be properly summed up as this will help in making the different propositions that are: The population generally increases faster than the production of food. On the other hand, when there is increase in population that is regarded as the geometric progression and the production of food will be arithmetic progression and when the means of the subsistence increases, then there is increase in the population as well (Castaldo et al., 2017). Food is necessary element in the life of individuals, and this helps in exercising a proper check on the entire population as well. Furthermore, it can be explained that population is limited by subsistence means (Wolf and Floyd, 2017). There are different kinds of criticism of the Malthusian theory wherein the grounds are described as follows: It has been seen that the theory of Malthus or the pessimistic conclusions did not borne out in the history and the forecast that has been provided by Malthus was falsified in the Western world. Malthus has done proper comparison of the food with the increase in the food and the production alone. This comparison was not enough as there are different other considerations as well that had to be taken into consideration as well (Baker and Saren, 2016). The Malthusian theory is applicable in the todays world as well as there are different preventive checks that have been exercised and there is proper operation of the positive checks as well. The population theory has huge importance in the organizational behavior as well as on the individuals working in the organization. Malthusian theory helps in understanding the importance of the external environment in the organization as this will help in understanding the demand of a particular product and their supply in the external market as well. The perspective that is most compelling in nature is the strategic choice as this helps the organizations in making proper strategic decisions and these are the decisions that are sustainable in nature as well. In the management view, the strategic choice refers to view that the different relationships that are powerful in nature in different contexts of organization along with managerial accountability are restricted by different factors such as technological advancement as well as availability (Castaldo et al., 2017). The entire process of strategic choice as well as planning helps in creating a proper corporate strategy in nature as this will help in involving variety of the options that are strategic in nature along with decisions that are strategic in nature as well. These are the strategic decisions that are the essence of the entire corporate strategy as well. The entire responsibility of process of planning will help in surfacing the different strategic issues along with the different range of uncertainties as this will help in shaping the issues along with understanding the relationship among them. Proper comparison is essential in nature as this helps in understanding the relative potential effects on the entire performance of the organization and with such strategic issues the different strategies can be explored to understand the different issues along with the strategic elephants (Castaldo et al., 2017). The strategic choice has huge role in the corporate performance as this helps in setting targets of the entire performance that will benefit the beneficiaries. Proper setting of such levels helps in proper decision making process in the entire organization as well. This decision making process will help in gaining satisfactory performance and this will be a major choice as well. However there are different factors that affects the strategic choice in organization that are Environmental constraints, reaction of the competitors, constraints in information, effect of the previous strategy, time constraints and the preferences and values. Proper process of the strategic choice is essential in nature as this will help in focusing on the different alternatives as this will help in narrowing down the choice to one particular strategy that is feasible in nature. In the corporate level, the strategic alternatives are stability, expansion as well as combination or retrenchment, however on the other hand the business level strategies include differentiation, focused strategy of business as well. Secondly, the organization has to analyze the alternatives of the strategic choice that includes both objective as well as subjective factors. The strategies has to be evaluated properly as this will help in making proper strategic choice and it will help in understanding the most suitable strategic choice that will help in analyzing both external as well as internal environment of the organization (Castaldo et al., 2017). Strategic choice in the organization helps in analyzing both the external and internal environment that are esse ntial in nature and this will help in achieving the goals of the organization as well. Therefore, it can be concluded that strategic choice is the perspective that is most compelling in nature as this focuses both on external and internal environment. This is the choice that helps in analyzing the decision making of the individuals both outside as well as inside the organization. Strategic choice helps in proper decision making of the individuals as this will help in evaluating and analyzing the strategies (Castaldo et al., 2017). Strategic choice theory was applied during the period of industrial relation in the United States and this has huge influence on the changes that were taking place rapidly as well. The determinism approach was not taken into consideration as that focused on the external environment and the internal environment was not provided proper importance as it was required. References Anastasiou, D. and Kauffman, J.M., 2013, August. The social model of disability: Dichotomy between impairment and disability. InThe Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine(Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 441-459). Oxford University Press. Baker, M.J. and Saren, M. eds., 2016.Marketing theory: a student text. Sage. Berofsky, B., 2015.Determinism. Princeton University Press. Castaldo, P., Nastri, E., Piluso, V. and Pisapia, A., 2017. Probabilistic theory of plastic mechanism control.ce/papers,1(2-3), pp.2906-2915. Clegg, S.R., Kornberger, M. and Pitsis, T., 2015.Managing and organizations: An introduction to theory and practice. Sage. Epstein, J., 2014. The Intelligence of a Machine. Felin, T., Foss, N.J. and Ployhart, R.E., 2015. The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory.Academy of Management Annals,9(1), pp.575-632. Foss, N.J. and Knudsen, C. eds., 2013.Towards a competence theory of the firm(Vol. 2). Routledge. Franklin, R.L., 2017.Freewill and determinism: A study of rival conceptions of man(Vol. 7). Taylor Francis. Hill, C.W., Jones, G.R. and Schilling, M.A., 2014.Strategic management: theory: an integrated approach. Cengage Learning. Lam, S.K., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y. and Schillewaert, N., 2013, May. Resistance to brand switching when a radically new brand is introduced: A social identity theory perspective. American Marketing Association. Maudlin, T., 2014. What bell did.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical,47(42), p.424010. Moulin, H., 2014.The strategy of social choice(Vol. 18). Elsevier. Vanwonterghem, I., Jensen, P.D., Dennis, P.G., Hugenholtz, P., Rabaey, K. and Tyson, G.W., 2014. Deterministic processes guide long-term synchronised population dynamics in replicate anaerobic digesters.The ISME journal,8(10), pp.2015-2028. Wolf, C. and Floyd, S.W., 2017. Strategic planning research: Toward a theory-driven agenda.Journal of Management,43(6), pp.1754-1788. Xu, D. and Meyer, K.E., 2013. Linking theory and context:Strategy research in emerging economies after Wright et al.(2005).Journal of Management Studies,50(7), pp.1322-1346.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.